ASCB logo LSE Logo

Letter to the EditorFree Access

Prospective Student Database: Technological Support for Assessing the Effectiveness of Graduate Recruitment Activities

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0057

    To the Editor:

    As many of the readers of CBE—Life Sciences Education know, academic institutions compete to attract a finite number of graduate students. Prospective students make high-stakes decisions regarding graduate education, and educational institutions commit significant and sustained resources to recruit, retain, and train students. Approaches to manage recruitment and admissions would allow data-driven decisions concerning resource allocation. Applicant tracking systems are used in human resource management to provide a central applicant database and a set of processes and tools to help employers manage recruitment and hiring efforts (Gardner et al., 2003; Ngai and Wat, 2006; Alshibly, 2011; Laumer et al., 2015); however, academic institutions have been slow to adopt these tracking methods and instead depend on less sophisticated approaches for reasons of scale, expertise, and cost. We designed and created a Prospective Student Database that is purpose-built for tracking applicant movement through the recruitment and admissions processes in graduate education at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences. The system matches prospective applicants with students who have been admitted and, subsequently, with students who have enrolled at the institution. Admitted and enrolled students from one year can be queried against the list of prospective applicants from the current year and previous years using unique identifiers generated by the system (Codd, 2002). Thus, determination of prospective applicants who are admitted and which of the admitted applicants matriculate provides a clear understanding of recruitment outcomes.

    The reporting feature of this database provides standard reports that inform recruiters and academic institutions about the success of recruitment activities by event, date, and year of matriculation (Figure 1; Wilson et al., 2018). Tracking the effectiveness of different recruitment strategies and the utility of individual events enables institutions to direct resources toward successful approaches. As proof of principle, our recent work (Wilson et al., 2018) that assesses our graduate school's initiatives on recruiting and retaining underrepresented minority students used this Prospective Student Database and a network of databases (admissions, student, and alumni databases) to track recruitment activities (Prospective Student Database), student metrics (admissions database), candidacy examination outcomes (academic affairs database), attrition (academic affairs database), and career paths (alumni database). Thus, this system can be used by recruiters, faculty, staff, programs, and administrative leaders in graduate education for a complete picture of applicant outcomes.

    FIGURE 1.

    FIGURE 1. Example reports generated by the Prospective Student Database. Users can query the database and determine the effectiveness of recruitment events and activities by selecting one of the four “reports” generated by the database: “All Prospects By Events,” “Applicants By Date,” “Applicants Who Were Prospects,” and “Students Who Were Prospects.”

    While the Prospective Student Database can be used as a stand-alone application, the real value of this platform is its scalability and adaptability as multi-user network-based application in academic and student affairs offices that links pre-existing student databases in a graduate school setting—all of which are important for complete programmatic assessment. To our knowledge, this is the first functional platform to track academic recruiting strategies/events by matching prospective applicants with admissions and matriculation outcomes. Thus, we expect that this system will be adapted by graduate programs that may not have the resources to purchase or develop sophisticated predictive analytic tools currently in use by undergraduate programs.

    DOWNLOADING AND USING THE SAMPLE DATABASE

    Access to the sample database is available by clicking the following link: http://go.uth.edu/SampleProspect

    Briefly, follow these steps for a successful demonstration of the sample database. Detailed instructions are provided in a Word document titled “Steps for Successful Demonstration” and can be found by clicking the link.

    1. Create a folder on your Windows computer: C:/Sample­Prospect.

    2. Download and unzip the files provided using the link above.

    3. Save the unzipped files under the new folder C:/SampleProspect.

    4. Open the Sample Prospect Access Database (SampleProspect.accdb).

    5. Click Process Prospects and Applicants and follow the step-by-step instructions to import the sample Prospect, Admissions, and Student, which are provided as Excel spreadsheets.

    6. Click the Return button to return to the workflow switchboard.

    7. Users can now match prospect to applicants using the Match by Email or Match by Name buttons.

    8. Once matches have been made, users can click on the Example Reports button for complete reports of recruitment activities.

    In conclusion, graduate programs in STEM, with support from federal and private agencies, spend considerable resources to recruit a diverse student body, albeit with variable success (Antonio, 2002; National Science Foundation, 2014; National Institutes of Health, 2015; Gibbs et al., 2016; Heggeness et al., 2016; Mervis, 2016). Accurate reporting on outcomes is required for assessing the return on investments in recruitment and retention strategies. The Prospective Student Database can help programs address whether the success of mechanisms used to recruit students are proportional to cost, and whether the retention and outcomes of graduate students are linked to recruitment programming.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    We thank Michelle Barton, PhD, and Michael Blackburn, PhD, for helpful comments.

    REFERENCES

  • Alshibly, H. (2011). Human resources information systems success assessment: An integrative model. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5, 157–169. Google Scholar
  • Antonio, A. L. (2002). Faculty of color reconsidered: Reassessing contributions to scholarship. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 582–602 Google Scholar
  • Codd, E. F. (2002). A relational model of data for large shared data banks. In Broy, M.Denert, E. (Eds.), Software pioneers: Contributions to software engineering (pp. 263–294). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  • Gardner, S., Lepak, D., & M Bartol, K. (2003). Virtual HR: The impact of information technology on the human resource professional. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 159–179. Google Scholar
  • Gibbs, K. D., Basson, J., Xierali, I. M., & Broniatowski, D. A. (2016). Decoupling of the minority PhD talent pool and assistant professor hiring in medical school basic science departments in the US. Elife, 5, e213935. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21393 Google Scholar
  • Heggeness, M. L., Evans, L., Pohlhaus, J. R., & Mills, S. L. (2016). Measuring diversity of the National Institutes of Health-funded workforce. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 91(8), 1164–1172. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001209 MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Laumer, S., Maier, C., & Eckhardt, A. (2015). The impact of business process management and applicant tracking systems on recruiting process performance: An empirical study. Journal of Business Economics, 85(4), 421–453. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0758-9 Google Scholar
  • Mervis, J. (2016). Scientific workforce. NSF makes a new bid to boost diversity.Science, 351(6277), 1017. doi: 10.1126/science.351.6277.1017 MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • National Institutes of Health. (2015, January 12). Notice of NIH's Interest in Diversity. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-053.html Google Scholar
  • National Science Foundation (NSF). (2014). Pathways to Broadening Participation in Response to the CEOSE 2011-2012 Recommendation. Retrieved from www.nsf.gov/od/broadeningparticipation/PathwaysToBroadeningParticipationInResponseToCEOSE2011-2012Recommendation_Nov2014.pdf Google Scholar
  • Ngai, E. W. T., & Wat, F. K. T. (2006). Human resource information systems: A review and empirical analysis. Personnel Review, 35(3), 297–314. doi: 10.1108/00483480610656702 Google Scholar
  • Wilson, M. A., DePass, A., & Bean, A. J. (2018). Institutional interventions that remove barriers to recruit and retain diverse biomedical PhD students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2), ar27. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-09-0210 LinkGoogle Scholar